I've been reading other blogs for a while now, and I find some of the posts about sex to be either funny as all hell, or pathetically sad...depending on the day, or author. This is not intended as a call out, so people can insult me by trying to rate how bed-able I might be. The opinion of most of the planet on that issue means nothing to me...but I found myself thinking about sex, and sexual attitudes this morning.
I was born in 1960....just before the "free love" nonsense began.
Women were still expected to 'hold out" for marriage...A rather appalling game where guys tried, and girls were supposed to say "no". There were harsh penalties for the girls who didn't....including pregnancy, and abandonment. If a guy did have sex with his steady, it was "proof" that she was not wife and mother material, and he could actually DROP her for it. Some "did the right thing", and married their sullied flowers...but it was always looked back on as a point of shame.
The ideal was that you had a romance, fell in love, got engaged, got married, and THEN you had sex.
They never explained how all the "no's" of a person's past..(.the thought that sex was dirty, until being sanctified by marriage) were somehow going to turn into a happy "YES!" I heard from my parents generation that "sex wasn't everything". They insisted you could have a perfectly happy relationship without it...but they were also the first ones to go for Viagra, even after learning that taking the little blue pill could kill them. My parent's generation had their own myths. One was that once a woman was done having babies, sex was over. That is patently stupid. I can certify that sex actually got better in my 30's, when I was long done with baby making. And the idea that men were supposed to accept celibacy once their wife was done having kids? SERIOUSLY?
No...sex is not everything...but it beats the hell out of card games, and remains a bonding point between men and women long after procreation is over.
Now, my generation was sexually screwed up in reverse. We expected to have sex, and then find an emotional connection after we had established "sexual compatibility." WOW...what a stupid notion. We discovered that people could be wonderful in bed...and total assholes out of it. We learned to not value ourselves enough to give love a chance, first. That was being all up tight, and square. You were supposed to be free and easy, and enjoy sex. Not a bad notion...but an awful lot of bait and switch went on. Guys of my generation were about getting laid...and used it against the girls of my day.
"God...it was JUST sex....why are you getting all hung up?"
"I hope you understand...this doesn't mean I am into you or anything."
"Wow...that was great...but I have a class (or a meeting, or an appointment) in the morning...would you mind letting yourself out?"
Now a girl did not have to have sex...but if she chose not to, she also was choosing to be alone, for the most part. It took a strong personality to want to wait---and the whole "How do you know it will work, until you try it?" logic was very persuasive. We weren't sluts...quite the contrary...we took relationships seriously...but the idea of being tied to someone we found repellent sexually was terrifying. So a lot of us played the cautious libertine, searching for our other half. And there were RULES...let no one suggest otherwise. We had tossed the sex is for marriage rule book, and adopted the Playboy "why buy the cow" attitude. Women were supposed to be willing, and good in bed...but not sluts. (I know...that's a crazy standard, and no one actually knew WHERE the line was...until you crossed it.) They were supposed to take care of birth control on their own---or if they didn't and got knocked up, NOT BOTHER the Guy about it, because they CHOSE to have sex. (The guy also chose to have sex, but hey, he was the GUY. Double standard, of course) That meant you were perfectly free to have the brat, but don't think about child support. Or have an abortion....but you would pay for it yourself. Or put the kid up for adoption...whatever the hell you wanted...just DON'T bother the GUY. (Which is why I roll on the floor laughing when people talk about how "feminism" destroyed the American family. Bullshit.)
My point is that my generation is JUST as fucked up about sex as our parents were. And that was before AIDS and a dozen other social diseases showed up in the main stream. We've now raised a generation of kids who either are terrified to have sex, or figure they will die anyway---and take NO precautions, to prevent babies or disease. (If you are one of the exceptions, my apologies...and good on you...but you have to know you are NOT the norm.) So the whole "saving til marriage thing" did not work for a majority of people. Neither did the "If it feels good, do it." notions. Making me wonder if there is a middle ground...where a person can honestly be respected for saying..."You know...I just don't want to screw. I'd like to love someone first." It would be lovely if sex wasn't a bargaining chip in relationships. It would be magnificent if we stuck to people who shared our values...rather than ranging off the ranch, "sowing our oats" then CLAIMING we are "traditional".
Sex is part of who we are. It doesn't make us less. But we have got to stop hanging it with expectations, or worse...hating ourselves for being who we are. Marriage is not magic...it doesn't fix things or people who are badly broken. I happen to believe in love...and I also believe that love can have a sexual connection. Sex almost NEVER has a loving connection, unless it was there in the first place. But you don't GET there instantly.
Thoughts?
Recent Comments